Confession 1: for almost five years, I worked as a call girl. True story. (And it was legen ... DARY.)*
Confession 2, and a Nice Little Story:

I didn't have the slightest idea of who
Belle de Jour was until one of my Nights of Endless Channel-Surfing and I came across re-runs of Secret Diary of a Call Girl. After initially dismissing it as a very fictionalised version of what being a call girl is really about, I gave the blog a chance.

Fast-forward to today and after having read all of Belle's blog posts, I am enamoured with this witty, intelligent, sassy, educated woman that went into a very stigmatised job and came out if it (as far as I know) relatively unscathed.

I recently read this post by Tracy Corrigan. My siding with Belle is, surprisingly, not related to my being a fan. It’s more about Tracy Corrigan being ... well, I’ll let you judge for yourselves:

It is possible that Belle has emerged from her experiences without incurring psychological or physical damage. But it’s no excuse for projecting prostitution as a rather fun, pragmatic passtime for smart girls.

(...) I recently heard a former prostitute explain on the radio that many prostitutes are drug addicts not only because they work to finance their habits, but also because they need to medicate themselves in order to be able to ply their trade.

My problem with Belle is not so much that she chose to turn to prostitution, just because she didn’t want to do a job that was boring and poorly paid, but that she then chose to promote it as a cool career option.

Here’s some shocking news for most of you: there are many women, intelligent and educated, working in the Sex Industry. Willingly. And come out “without incurring psychological or physical damage”.

What’s up with how we look at sex work, overall? Somehow, for some reason I don’t understand at all, the sex worker is normally a plastic-looking vixen or Casanova that’s actually a broken and post-abuse child from a broken home inside. And in most cases, they’re nursing a drug habit “because they need to medicate themselves in order to be able to ply their trade.”.

Here’s the kicker: if we switch our point of view, if we stop for a minute to think a very normal person could willingly go into sex work and keep its personal integrity mostly intact? It’s glamorising prostitution, and that my dears won’t fly with most.

As Belle has done in the past, I would never say that prostitution is “a cool career option”. More often than not, you come home exhausted, angry, and sad. Don’t even get me started on the fictional demons it can bring into your dating life, the stigma being a sex worker carries, and the potential dangers and hardships of having your work personna discovered by friends and family.

I will also say that, hard as it might have been at times, it has provided me with many stories – some hilarious, some cringe-worthy, some ladden with advice. From the other side of sex-work, I can say I went into it and came out of it relatively unscathed. Maybe slightly bruised, never broken, and loads wiser. Still, I wouldn’t reccomend sex work ... like I wouldn’t reccomend going into med school, or Political Science, or a career as a stokebroker.

I have a bit of advice for Tracy Corrigan: please stick to writing about business and finance, which is clearly your area of expertise. And let us, the sex workers, write about prostitution.

*Inside joke between Partner and I, who was present at the time of writing and publishing this post. Also, proof that I cannot take anything seriously.


edit post
Disclaimer: this post has nothing to do with my being totes gay for Michelle Obama. Really, I'm being objective here.
Disclaimer's disclaimer: I am, for all intents and purposes, very much heterosexual and in love with my Partner. Sorry, 'Chelle - it's not you, it's me.

Health care costs and obesity are on the rise almost everywhere. Not surprisingly, they're related: excessive body weight causes a plethora of conditions that are chronic, difficult, and expensive to deal with.

So Michelle Obama, with the purpose of fighting childhood obesity in the United States, launches Let's Move. The statement on the webpage is clear and straightforward:

Childhood obesity or excess weight threatens the healthy future of one third of American children. We spend $150 billion every year to treat obesity-related conditions, and that number is growing.

Obesity rates tripled in the past 30 years, a trend that means, for the first time in our history, American children may face a shorter expected lifespan than their parents.


In short: they want a healthier youth, and reduction of costs in health care. It's a win-win situation for everyone involved, no?
Not if you're a fat disabled activist, no it's not.

To them it's fat hatred and discrimination; and, if you look at Shakesville's posts about it?: it sounds like it's really a freaking Auschwitz designed for overweight and obese individuals.

Sweet bloody Jesus Christ on a mother-fucking pogo stick.

I am aware you can be 'chubby', 'chunky', have 'curves', be a 'BBW' and 'more to love', and still be healthy and fit. I know there are medical reasons, like thyroid conditions and side-effects of some drugs, that cause significant and at times, unavoidable weight gain.

I am aware that discrimination can be a huge deal regarding obesity, if it's a health professional that's discriminating.

But I will never apologise for saying this: the fat acceptance movement is delusional and dangerous.

A BMI higher than 28 will try and kill you via diabetes, high blood pressure and oh you know the rest. And if it doesn't kill you, it will lessen the quality of your life and overall health. Obesity is an epidemic, it does take a toll on the rising costs of health care for everyone, and yes there are cases in which weight loss HAS to be achieved. And yes, about the last statement - weight loss can be achieved by going on a diet and exercising more.

This is not about looks. This is not about aesthetics, or how we perceive fat people. It's about obesity's overall objective effect on health and a nation's economy. So, if you do not have hypothyroidism and are not confined to a wheelchair? Shut your damn trap before taking another bite out of that Twinkie.

edit post

what, who, why

Posted on 7:12 PM, under

After my rather-crass first post, I realised I had not made a proper statement. As rude as it was, it was also vague. So, let's break it down.

What is this blog about?
Being politically incorrect, against feminism, fat acceptance, some facets of disability rights, and many forms of today's social-justice.
Commentary on foreign affairs and international politics.

What do you believe in?
Equality for all - plain and simple. A world where women and men get the same amount on their pay check for doing the same task, and equal parenting rights.
Calling someone 'black' isn't racist.
Using words like lame, insane, idiot, etc. is not mentalist or ableist.
Prostitution should be legal and destigmatised - both for workers and their clients.
Being politically correct is useless.
The supremacy of (seedless) raspberry jam and Marmite over any other spread, on toast.
The daily encountering of, and dealing with, thick-headed individuals and subsequent feelings of anger and frustration.
Related: taking life with humour. There's no use in getting your knickers in a bunch over everything.
And if everything else fails: taking it with a grin on your lips and a Black Russian down your throat.

Who are you?
Your worst nightmare. But seriously, now.
Me in a nutshell: university student, early twenties. Sci-fi enthusiast and huge-time nerd. Oh, also: female. That's all you need to know for all intents and purposes.

Why are you doing this?
Because I am sick and tired of the extremes social justice has been taken to.
And, because I fucking felt like it.

edit post

Once upon a time, there were awesome women. These awesome women had power and control over themselves at a time where arranged marriage was the norm and a life of housekeeping and child-bearing was the most they could aspire to.

They realised, however, that it was time to extend her awesomeness to every woman. And so, the suffragettes fought to give women the right to vote, a right previously exercised only by men. Slowly but surely, in most countries, women began to have political rights.

During the World Wars, while men were away fighting, daughters of these awesome women began to replace them in various workplaces. They were empowered. But it wasn't enough - men came back, and they were shunted aside again, discriminated, viewed as not really necessary unless dinner needed to be prepared and the laundry folded away.

So the grand-daughters of these awesome women, the suffragettes, realised that the roots of the problem needed to be addressed. If a real change was to be made regarding laboural and political inequalities, the cultural inequalities needed to be solved.

If you fancy yourself a social-justiceist/feminist? You know how the story unfolds: miniskirt, Women's Liberation, Gloria Steinem, NWPC, Cheryl Frank and Jaqueline Flenner - to name very few organisations and women and events that helped shape the second wave of feminism.

However, the descendants of the suffragettes ... well, most of them can be described in this (amazing) quote:

You damn right I'm no feminist, cos all feminists give a monkey's for these days is how to claim breast pumps as tax exempt and where to find the best au pairs.

Belle de Jour
(taken from Feminisnt)

I have spent some time browsing feminist blogs - most notably, Shakesville. My feelings of 'Amen, sister!' were always muddled with deep-down feelings of - why is she going on about feminism, when she lives in an industrialised country, and has the privileges and access to all those things the Foremothers of Feminism didn't?

The straw that broke the camel's back?
This post.

I am Shakespeare's Sister.

I am the heir of Shakespeare's Sisters before me, who carved out rooms of their own, tiny pieces of space and time, in which they formed the habit of freedom and mustered the courage to write exactly what they thought. I heard their whispers, their haunting encouragement, telling me to put on their bodies laid down and become born. And on
October 5, 2004, I was born Shakespeare's Sister.

Melissa McEwan

Let's skip the fact that this just reeks of self-importance. Seriously, just cover your nose for a bit while I end this. It'll be quick - like the death from the stench of delusions of grandeur coming from this feminist.

If you are familiar with
A Room of One's Own you'll know that Shakespeare's Sister was a woman that had the same talents and gifts Shakespeare had but none of the recognition, because of the social, cultural, and political conditions of women during the time.

Check your calendars - you're in for a surprise - the 1600s? Over and done for more than 400 years, bro. In most industrialised countries, a woman generally holds the same rights men do. They can go to university, have a career and not give it up if they decide to become mothers, get paid the same as men in the same jobs, be in control of their sexuality and reproduction.

But when you take a movement that has given us women so much, and turn it into a stance from where you can argue the use of certain words because they are 'patriarchal' or 'sexist', or how some types of advertising hurts women's feelings/self-esteem and promotes eating disorders/sexism/rape, it's just ...
ridiculous. Not only that: it's not feminist.

The kick-ass women that gave me the rights and privileges I have today, I am sure, would sigh and face-palm at the so-called "third wave" of feminism.

In my mind, if Mary Wollstonecraft could see what feminism has become, she would be sorely disappointed. And so would every feminist of old. That is why I don't hold myself as a feminist any longer.

Because I, woman, have
privilege
thanks to them. I, woman, thank the feminists from the earlier centuries, to the end of the second wave. Without them, and the change they accomplished, I wouldn't be here. Suffragettes and bra-burners: I tip my hat to you.

So-called feminists of today: fuck you, for tarnishing the name of this movement. Fuck you, because while you're bitching about how we should all say 'humankind' instead of 'mankind' because it sounds less sexist to you, women in Saudi Arabia
still are not able to vote. Women in Latin America still have no right over their bodies, while you moan about how the portrayal of women in film and media is misogynistic. Fuck you. You are no feminists, and you are not doing feminism any good.


edit post

intro.

Posted on 11:37 PM, under

I am a sexist, ableist, and all-around politically incorrect pig.

I enjoy listening to and cracking jokes about hippies and their hairy armpits. I snort whenever I hear words like 'handicapable', 'cisgender', 'African American', and the like. As soon as I hear someone go on tirades against the Patriarchy, or Illuminati, or Zionists, or Republicans, or global warming? Yeah, they're pretty much not only tuned off - most of the times, they're permalabeled as idiots.

To cite an specific example of eye roll-inducing comments? "I am still very offended by the portrayal of Chinese Americans in The Hangover."

Being politically correct will be the death of rational, thorough, logical thinking.

Believe me, I tried the whole politically-correct thing. I fancied myself an eco-conscious, diversity-loving feminist social-justiceist. Then I realised: the more you try to include the more you exclude. The less you try to insult the less you'll make everyone happy. It was so disturbing, so depressing ...

... until I listened to an Inner Voice that said: "flip them the bird. You're not making them happy now, you won't make them happy ever. Ignore. And go with what feels right."

I am a lot of bad things. I am rude, obnoxious, ill-tempered. The worst of all is, I am brutally honest. And I will not give a crap about your feelings once I am meddled with.

I will make you seethe in anger. If you fancy yourself all the things I thought I was, chances are you'll contact me. You'll let me know you don't agree, and how you think I make society worse nowadays, or what have you.

Rest assured that in 9 cases out of 10, your e-mail will make no difference (just ask your Senator). The best you can do is make me giggle as I read your rant, or make me reflect in the odd chance. The worst you can do is ... nothing. I will delete your message and my life will go on, as happy as it was before.

In short?

I am a rude, sexist, ableist pig - and I wouldn't change it for the world.

edit post