Showing posts with label whiny people. Show all posts
Showing posts with label whiny people. Show all posts
Into my many forays in the Internet, I stumbled into this little gem.

person 1: Maybe hate isn’t the right word for this particular billboard. How about “Billboard of Crazy”?

person 2: I beg your pardon, those of us with actual mental illness don’t appreciate being used as everyone’s metaphor for violent irrationality.

I am surprised that stupid people's use of the Internet has not given me a stupidity-induced aneurysm yet. But let's dissect this, shall we?

My friend Merriam-Webster has this to say about the meaning of crazy:

1 a : full of cracks or flaws 2 a : mad, insane
b (1) : impractical (2) : erratic
c : being out of the ordinary : unusual 3 a : distracted with desire or excitement
b : absurdly fond : infatuated
c : passionately preoccupied : obsessed


Saying something is crazy doesn't, as you can see, automatically mean it's a synonym for mentally ill. It might not even be meant as something offensive. Likewise for ableist words like lame, idiot, insane, and ... seriously, it's going to come to a point where even walking and brain are going to become ableist words. Freaking pearl-clutchers.


Why be so knickers-in-a-bunch about language? Words are as offensive as the person that says them means them to be. Calling a kid retarded could very well mean acknowledging said kid's profound mental retardation, without the intention to insult. And calling that board crazy could very well mean calling it impractical, as opposite to comparing it to bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. It could be very, very far away from meaning to insult people with mental illnesses.


You'd be surprised by the amount of mentally ill people that do not give a crap when something's called crazy or insane. Just like many LGBTA aren't offended by fag, queer, homo, dyke, and the like. With chants like "we're queer, we're here", and movements like "mad pride", it's surprising to stumble into posts like the one above, or comments like this:


LAME? Cringe. Oh, my. I couldn't possibly let that one slide.


I've called cigarettes fags for as long as I can remember. And not once, not one single fucking time, have I been scolded by my gay friends. Because they're the sort that would rather campaign to have equal rights regarding marriage and adoption, that bitch about how much calling a cigarette a fag hurts them.


Social-justiceists, pick your fight: you can fight how people speak, or you can try and open people's minds and maybe change the way they think and thus make an actual difference. What's it going to be?


edit post
Disclaimer: this post has nothing to do with my being totes gay for Michelle Obama. Really, I'm being objective here.
Disclaimer's disclaimer: I am, for all intents and purposes, very much heterosexual and in love with my Partner. Sorry, 'Chelle - it's not you, it's me.

Health care costs and obesity are on the rise almost everywhere. Not surprisingly, they're related: excessive body weight causes a plethora of conditions that are chronic, difficult, and expensive to deal with.

So Michelle Obama, with the purpose of fighting childhood obesity in the United States, launches Let's Move. The statement on the webpage is clear and straightforward:

Childhood obesity or excess weight threatens the healthy future of one third of American children. We spend $150 billion every year to treat obesity-related conditions, and that number is growing.

Obesity rates tripled in the past 30 years, a trend that means, for the first time in our history, American children may face a shorter expected lifespan than their parents.


In short: they want a healthier youth, and reduction of costs in health care. It's a win-win situation for everyone involved, no?
Not if you're a fat disabled activist, no it's not.

To them it's fat hatred and discrimination; and, if you look at Shakesville's posts about it?: it sounds like it's really a freaking Auschwitz designed for overweight and obese individuals.

Sweet bloody Jesus Christ on a mother-fucking pogo stick.

I am aware you can be 'chubby', 'chunky', have 'curves', be a 'BBW' and 'more to love', and still be healthy and fit. I know there are medical reasons, like thyroid conditions and side-effects of some drugs, that cause significant and at times, unavoidable weight gain.

I am aware that discrimination can be a huge deal regarding obesity, if it's a health professional that's discriminating.

But I will never apologise for saying this: the fat acceptance movement is delusional and dangerous.

A BMI higher than 28 will try and kill you via diabetes, high blood pressure and oh you know the rest. And if it doesn't kill you, it will lessen the quality of your life and overall health. Obesity is an epidemic, it does take a toll on the rising costs of health care for everyone, and yes there are cases in which weight loss HAS to be achieved. And yes, about the last statement - weight loss can be achieved by going on a diet and exercising more.

This is not about looks. This is not about aesthetics, or how we perceive fat people. It's about obesity's overall objective effect on health and a nation's economy. So, if you do not have hypothyroidism and are not confined to a wheelchair? Shut your damn trap before taking another bite out of that Twinkie.

edit post

Once upon a time, there were awesome women. These awesome women had power and control over themselves at a time where arranged marriage was the norm and a life of housekeeping and child-bearing was the most they could aspire to.

They realised, however, that it was time to extend her awesomeness to every woman. And so, the suffragettes fought to give women the right to vote, a right previously exercised only by men. Slowly but surely, in most countries, women began to have political rights.

During the World Wars, while men were away fighting, daughters of these awesome women began to replace them in various workplaces. They were empowered. But it wasn't enough - men came back, and they were shunted aside again, discriminated, viewed as not really necessary unless dinner needed to be prepared and the laundry folded away.

So the grand-daughters of these awesome women, the suffragettes, realised that the roots of the problem needed to be addressed. If a real change was to be made regarding laboural and political inequalities, the cultural inequalities needed to be solved.

If you fancy yourself a social-justiceist/feminist? You know how the story unfolds: miniskirt, Women's Liberation, Gloria Steinem, NWPC, Cheryl Frank and Jaqueline Flenner - to name very few organisations and women and events that helped shape the second wave of feminism.

However, the descendants of the suffragettes ... well, most of them can be described in this (amazing) quote:

You damn right I'm no feminist, cos all feminists give a monkey's for these days is how to claim breast pumps as tax exempt and where to find the best au pairs.

Belle de Jour
(taken from Feminisnt)

I have spent some time browsing feminist blogs - most notably, Shakesville. My feelings of 'Amen, sister!' were always muddled with deep-down feelings of - why is she going on about feminism, when she lives in an industrialised country, and has the privileges and access to all those things the Foremothers of Feminism didn't?

The straw that broke the camel's back?
This post.

I am Shakespeare's Sister.

I am the heir of Shakespeare's Sisters before me, who carved out rooms of their own, tiny pieces of space and time, in which they formed the habit of freedom and mustered the courage to write exactly what they thought. I heard their whispers, their haunting encouragement, telling me to put on their bodies laid down and become born. And on
October 5, 2004, I was born Shakespeare's Sister.

Melissa McEwan

Let's skip the fact that this just reeks of self-importance. Seriously, just cover your nose for a bit while I end this. It'll be quick - like the death from the stench of delusions of grandeur coming from this feminist.

If you are familiar with
A Room of One's Own you'll know that Shakespeare's Sister was a woman that had the same talents and gifts Shakespeare had but none of the recognition, because of the social, cultural, and political conditions of women during the time.

Check your calendars - you're in for a surprise - the 1600s? Over and done for more than 400 years, bro. In most industrialised countries, a woman generally holds the same rights men do. They can go to university, have a career and not give it up if they decide to become mothers, get paid the same as men in the same jobs, be in control of their sexuality and reproduction.

But when you take a movement that has given us women so much, and turn it into a stance from where you can argue the use of certain words because they are 'patriarchal' or 'sexist', or how some types of advertising hurts women's feelings/self-esteem and promotes eating disorders/sexism/rape, it's just ...
ridiculous. Not only that: it's not feminist.

The kick-ass women that gave me the rights and privileges I have today, I am sure, would sigh and face-palm at the so-called "third wave" of feminism.

In my mind, if Mary Wollstonecraft could see what feminism has become, she would be sorely disappointed. And so would every feminist of old. That is why I don't hold myself as a feminist any longer.

Because I, woman, have
privilege
thanks to them. I, woman, thank the feminists from the earlier centuries, to the end of the second wave. Without them, and the change they accomplished, I wouldn't be here. Suffragettes and bra-burners: I tip my hat to you.

So-called feminists of today: fuck you, for tarnishing the name of this movement. Fuck you, because while you're bitching about how we should all say 'humankind' instead of 'mankind' because it sounds less sexist to you, women in Saudi Arabia
still are not able to vote. Women in Latin America still have no right over their bodies, while you moan about how the portrayal of women in film and media is misogynistic. Fuck you. You are no feminists, and you are not doing feminism any good.


edit post